» Criminal Defense Lawyer in Pickerington, OH » Sex Crimes Lawyer in Pickerington, OH » Gross Sexual Imposition Lawyer in Pickerington, OH
Facing a charge for Gross Sexual Imposition in Pickerington is a strong accusation. I have represented people in similar circumstances, and my goal is to ensure that your rights are protected at every stage of the process.
In Ohio, Gross Sexual Imposition (GSI) involves sexual contact that occurs through force, threat, or coercion, or when the alleged victim is unable to give consent. The law is detailed under Ohio Revised Code § 2907.05. It is important to remember that being accused of GSI does not mean you are guilty. The law requires the prosecution to prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt, and I focus on challenging that evidence and protecting your rights as your seasoned sex crimes defense attorney.
Under O.R.C. § 2907.05, Gross Sexual Imposition in Pickerington and elsewhere in Ohio involves sexual contact (meaning the touching of another person’s erogenous areas for sexual purposes) when specific unlawful circumstances exist. The law defines several ways this offense may occur, and each depends on the situation and the people involved:
Legislative updates have clarified what qualifies as sexual contact. Routine or nonsexual touching (such as a parent bathing a child or a medical professional performing an examination) does not meet the definition of GSI.
Every allegation of GSI in Pickerington demands a strong defense strategy. When I take on a case, I analyze every piece of evidence, including physical findings, witness statements, and any forensic material. My advanced training in forensics allows me to challenge DNA evidence that might appear conclusive at first glance.
Many GSI cases hinge on interpretation, whether the contact was consensual or whether it even occurred. Ohio law recognizes that the context matters. If you are accused of coercion or inappropriate contact, your defense must focus on the facts rather than assumptions. Through open communication, I make sure you understand the entire process, from investigation through potential trial.
In addition, if you have been accused or think you might be under investigation for GSI, it is crucial that you do not speak with the police without an attorney present. Even casual comments can be misunderstood or misrepresented.
I have seen many cases where early statements complicated the defense, so it is always better to have legal representation from the start so that your rights remain protected. Under O.R.C. § 2935.20, you have the right to consult with a criminal defense lawyer before making any statements, and exercising that right is one of the most important decisions you can make.
When you are accused of Gross Sexual Imposition in Pickerington, the right defense can make a difference in the outcome. Each case requires careful attention to detail, and I take the time to explain every step so that you understand your options and are fully aware of the state of your case. Call today to schedule a confidential consultation and discuss your situation directly with me.
Stepfather was accused of Rape and GSI by stepdaughter shortly after wife/mother filed for divorce. Despite the timing of the allegations, the Stepfather was indicted on 6 counts of Rape and 6 counts of GSI alleging sexual abuse 2 years prior. At trial, Andrew elicited over 150 “I don’t know” responses from the alleged victim during cross-examination. The phrase “I don’t know” was the ringing mantra of Andrew’s closing argument. The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty on all charges after only 30 minutes of deliberation.
Grandfather of six was facing life without parole due to charges alleging rape of his nine-year-old granddaughter. An investigation of the case revealed that the mother of the alleged victim had previously made a false allegation of her own. At trial, evidence was presented that the mother of the alleged victim had estranged herself from the family. The mother claimed she suffered mental abuse and financial ruin at the hands of her parents. During cross-examination of the granddaughter, it was shown that she was making claims at the insistence of her mother. The cross-examination combined with the testimony of the Client’s other grandchildren led to a Not Guilty verdict.
A group of friends went to Ohio University to attend a concert and visit siblings. The group spent the night in a large dorm suite. The Client mutually shared a twin bed with one of the female friends. Two years later, the 23-year-old female “remembered” that she had been sexually assaulted the night after the concert by Client. The prosecutor initially believed the female and was inclined to file Rape charges. Andrew conducted a thorough investigation including interviewing everyone who was with the two that night at the concert or who slept in the suite. After protracted negotiations with the prosecutor’s office, no charges were filed against the Client.
Attorney Andrew Stevenson’s client was under investigation for gross sexual imposition, a fourth-degree felony that would have carried 6 to 18 months in prison, up to $5,000 in fines, and Tier I sex offender registration for 15 years. Stevenson stepped in before formal charges were filed. The case was closed without a single charge ever being brought against the client.
Attorney Andrew Stevenson’s client came in facing a rape charge alongside a gross sexual imposition count. The rape charge alone was a first-degree felony putting a mandatory 3 to 11 years in prison, up to $20,000 in fines, and lifetime Tier III sex offender registration on the line. Stevenson got the rape charge dropped, and the client pled guilty to just the GSI, a fourth-degree felony carrying 6 to 18 months in prison, up to $5,000 in fines, and Tier I registration for 15 years.
Attorney Andrew Stevenson’s client came in facing unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, a fourth-degree felony that carried 6 to 18 months in prison, up to $5,000 in fines, and mandatory Tier II sex offender registration for 25 years. Stevenson got the case dismissed outright.
Facing two counts of sexual battery and the presumption of prison that comes with the offense, the client confronted exposure of up to 10 years across the two felony counts. Attorney Andrew Stevenson’s sentencing advocacy was able to keep the client out of prison entirely.
Indicted for rape, the client faced mandatory prison time, up to 16 years under Ohio’s first-degree felony sentencing, and lifetime sex offender registration. Attorney Andrew Stevenson secured a full dismissal, leaving the client with no conviction and no registration.